![]() |
|
||||||||||
|
Are Humans Evolving Back Into Apes? The Fossils Say Yes A lot of
people say we evolved from chimpanzees and gorillas. I beg to differ! The chimps and gorillas evolved from us! We are the more primitive species! Perhaps we evolved from some cousin of the
orangutans, but we did not come from chimps or gorillas. This
argument comes from the fossil record.
There are no gorillas or chimpanzees in the fossil record prior to
comparatively recent times.[1] Although hominid fossils are common, there
has been only one find of chimpanzee fossils, dating to between 284,000 and
545,000 years ago.[2]
As Harrison said, The evolutionary history of extant humanoids (i.e. –
gorillas, chimps, and humans) is poorly known, with the notable exception of
humans, which have a relatively complete fossil record extending back more than
4 million years… the fossil record for African apes is entirely unknown. The evolution of the orangutan is, by
comparison, much better documented.[3] Just going from what the fossils say, the chimps and
the gorillas have not been on this planet nearly as long as we have. Some say that we can't find more fossils of
chimps and gorillas because they live in the jungle, and fossils don't preserve
well in the jungle. But does this make
sense? How is it that Pleistocene
Orangutan fossils are scattered all across southeast Asia?[4] Is that not jungle too? In the Miocene, Europe was covered in
tropical forests. Ape fossils have been
recovered from hundreds of locations all across European strata of that
time. In fact, when the European jungles
retreated in the late Miocene, so did the apes, for they cannot be found in
great numbers in Europe except for where there was jungle.[5] From the early Eocene to the early Oligocene,
196 fossil primate species are known, and from the late Oligocene to the late
Pleistocene, 167 fossil primate species are known. Fossil primates have been found on every
continent except Australia and Antarctica.[6] Thus, the primate fossil record is
comparatively well-known, both in numbers and across time frames. If chimps and gorillas were in Africa for the
past 6 or 7 million years, since the time they allegedly diverged from us, then
we should see more evidence for it. Despite
the fossil gap, the chimps and gorillas are very much related to us. The chimps share 98.6% of our DNA, or 95.2%
if deletions are added to substitutions.[7] They look like us, they have DNA like us, and
they even act like us. But they are not
found in the fossil record before us. So
we did not evolve from them. If
anything, they evolved from us! If you
took a chimpanzee, and put both a human and a gorilla right in front of his
nose, and then asked him "Who's your daddy," the chimp would point at
the human, not the gorilla. Likewise, a
gorilla would also point to the human, not the chimp. A test using the agent antiserum against
albumin revealed that both chimps and gorillas are more related to us than to
each other.[8] Despite having much in common, such as hairy
bodies, knuckle walking, and much smaller brain sizes than we do, they are more
closely related to us than to each other.
A Jukes-Cantor measurement of the distance between genomes sheds some
light on the subject. When comparing the
chimp genome to gorilla and human genomes, the chimp is in all tests more
closely related to humans than to gorillas.
When comparing the gorilla genome to chimp and human genomes, the
non-coding genes, autosomals, pseudogenes, and synonymous genes of the gorilla
show a closer genetic relationship to humanity than to the chimp. For non-synonymous genes, the gorilla shows
just a hair more affinity toward the chimp – these being the genes under the
pressures of natural selection.[9] Here's
why: non-synonymous genes are subject to
the pressures of natural selection, whereas synonymous genes are not. Gorillas and chimps live in similar jungle
environments, and this has caused them to acquire similar characteristics, but
the synonymous genes reveal lineages by means of tracing DNA that has been left
unaltered by selective pressures. That's
how we know chimps and gorillas are more closely related to us than to each
other. Natural selection has caused
chimps and gorillas to look more similar to each other than to us. However, when their genomes are analyzed,
chimps and gorillas both turn out to be more closely related to us than to each
other. The Evolution, Devolution, and Devilization of
Humanity It appears
that some aliens don't really want humans on this planet, so they have
attempted to devolve us back into less intelligent animals. To reverse human evolution, they have
inserted ape-like DNA into our gene pool, thus causing gorillas and chimps and
other small-brained hominids to evolve from us. The
predictions of the so-called "molecular clock" tell us that humans
and chimps diverged from each other 6 million years ago, and that humans and
gorillas diverged 7 million years ago.[10] Some give it a wider range, from 5 to 8
million years ago.[11] This information is in tension with the
fossil record, which does not show chimp or gorilla fossils until much more
recent times. Be that as it may, let us
suppose that the molecular clock is correct, and that the fossils just have not
been found. In this
scenario, then, if we trace our ancestry back through the fossil record, we
should expect to find our ancestors from 6 and 7 million years ago to look like
primitive chimps and gorillas. Yet the
fossils of this age that are potentially ancestral to humans reflect more
similarity to humanity than to chimps or gorillas. Sahelanthropus
was an ape-like human in precisely this time frame of 6 to 7 million years
ago. It had human characteristics such
as a flatter face, smaller canines, and thicker tooth enamel than in other
apes, and a human-like attachment of the spinal chord to the brain, which
indicates that Sahelanthropus probably
walked on two feet, instead of on his knuckles.[12] As Jobling et al say, "these findings
can barely be reconciled with a chimp-human split of 5-7 million years
ago."[13] About this same time there appears Orrorin,[14]
walking on two feet, and with thick enamel on its teeth – two distinctly human
characteristics not shared by chimps or gorillas. There is also Ardipithecus, which has chimp-like characters (thin enamel to name
one); yet it could stand on two feet more efficiently than a chimp.[15] From this, we might conclude that humans are
devolving into apes, as Jobling et al said, All these early hominid fossils appear to represent
chimpanzee-sized, upright-walking species… The most radical possibility is that
bipedalism is the primitive trait and knuckle-walking in chimpanzees is
derived…[16] One possible explanation is that the molecular
evidence is just wrong, and that chimps and gorillas diverged much
earlier. Suwa et al propose this, based
on some 10 million year-old gorilla-like teeth, yet unlike modern gorilla
teeth, these have thick enamel and other differences.[17] Our Unfortunate Relatives The fossil
remains of the hominid Homo floresiensis
are only 38,000 to 18,000 years old, yet the forehead is receding, and the
brain size is smaller than that of the ape-man Australopithecus – only 380 cubic centimeters, which is
surprisingly tiny even for its relative body size. Australopithecus
and Paranthropus had gone extinct
2 million years previously, and even they had larger brains for their body
size! H. floresiensis is in most other respects human, including its
teeth, basic skull shape, and ability to walk upright on two feet.[18] Despite its small brain, it appears to have
used tools and lit fires. For some, its
technological achievements indicate it must have been derived from more
advanced hominids such as possibly Homo
erectus. Yet H. erectus had a brain more than twice the size and was already
extinct by then. Multiple specimens have
been found, which means we are not dealing with a dwarf or abnormal mutant, but
rather with a regular population.[19] Humans just like us were contemporary with H. floresiensis. Even the Neanderthals were almost
extinct. We might say we are their
nearest relative, if it weren't for the fact that the wrist of H. floresiensis is apparently more
primitive than both human and Neanderthal wrists.[20] Some even argue that the root of its
divergence from the human line is quite ancient – going back to Homo habilis.[21] The problem is, H. habilis died out nearly 2 million years ago. Where are its fossils for the past 2 million
years? Could this
strange creature be the product of malicious space aliens, who were attempting
to thwart human evolution by devolving us into lower apes? The natives of Indonesia claim that a small
hairy clan of people who spoke a different language was still present some 300
years ago.[22] H.
floresiensis was found in Indonesia.
Apparently, the ape-men are coming back.
Read more about the evidence for intelligent life before humans. The creationist narrative in Genesis 1 is contradicted by many ancient Christian texts. Instead of an Almighty Creator God, ancient Christian texts espouse that the universe is born from blind arrogance and stupidity. The angels caused evolution to occur from species to species. There are many gods, (or aliens?), and the Christian God is just one among them. Satan the Devil writes scripture, and thus the Bible was polluted with Genesis 1. Archaeology and modern scholarship demonstrate that Genesis is indeed corrupted. Cavemen walk with Adam and Eve. Esoteric prophecies reveal the coming of Christ, and also reveal the dark forces that govern the cosmos. Such are the ancient Christian writings. Science vindicates the truth of these ideas. Evolution often happens too fast for Darwin’s theory. Gaps in the fossil record indicate that some kind of unnatural force acts together with natural selection. Astrobiology reveals that intelligent life probably evolved long before us. The fossil record reveals strange clues that aliens abducted species and transported them across oceans, and that DNA from diverse lineages was combined to spawn hybrid species. Evidently, aliens influence evolution, and they are the gods of the world’s religions. This is not fiction. All these facts are thoroughly documented in the links above.
[1] McKenna, Malcolm C; Bell, Susan K. Classification of Mammals Above the Species Level. 1997, Columbia University Press, New York, NY, p 349 [2] McBrearty, Sally; Jablonski, Nina G. First Fossil Chimpanzee. 2005, Nature 437, p 105 [3] Harrison, T. Fossil Apes. 2002, McGraw-Hill Encyclopedia of Science and Technology Vol 7, New York, NY, p 456-459 [4] Harrison, T. ibid. [5] Eronen, Jussi T; Rook, Lorenzo. The Mio-Pliocene European Primate Fossil Record: Dynamics and Habitat Tracking. 2004, Journal of Human Evolution 47, p 323-341 [6] Tavare, Simon; Marshall, Charles R; Will, Oliver; Soligo, Christophe; Martin, Robert D. Using the Fossil Record to Estimate the Age of the Last Common Ancestor of Extant Primates. 2002, Nature 416, p 726-729 [7] Jobling, Mark A; Hurles, Matthew E; Tyler-Smith, Chris. Human Evolutionary Genetics: Origins, Peoples & Disease. 2004, Garland Publishing, New York, NY, p 215 [8] Jobling, Mark A; et al. ibid, p 211 [9] Jobling, Mark A; et al. ibid, p 213-214 [10] Dawkins, Richard. The Ancestor's Tale: A Pilgrimage to the Dawn of Evolution. 2004, Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston, MA, p 96, 107 [11] Wood, Bernard A. Human Evolution: Early Radiations. 2002, John Wiley & Sons, Encyclopedia of Life Sciences, www.els.ne [12] Brunet, M; Guy, F; Pilbeam, D; Mackaye, H T; Likius, Andossa; Ahounta, D; Beauvilain, A; Bondel, C; Bocherens, H; Boisserie, J R; de Bonis, L; Coppens, Y; Dejax, J; Denys, C; Duringer, P; Eisenmann, V; Fanone, G; Fronty, P; Geraads, D; Lehmann, T; Lihoreau, F; Louchart, A; Mahamat, A; Merceron G; Mouchelin, G; Otero, O; Campomanes, P P; de Leon, M P; Rage, J C; Sapanet, M; Schuster, M; Sudre, J; Tassy, P; Valentin, X; Vignaud, P; Viriot, L; Zazzo, A; Zollikofer, C. A New Hominid from the Upper Miocene of Chad, Central Africa. 2002, Nature 418, p 145-151 [13] Jobling, Mark A; Hurles, Matthew E; Tyler-Smith, Chris. Human Evolutionary Genetics: Origins, Peoples & Disease. 2004, Garland Publishing, New York, NY, p 237 [14] Senut, B; Pickford, M; Gommery, D; Mein, P; Cheboi, K; Coppens, Y. First Hominid from the Miocene (Lukeino Formation, Kenya). 2001, C R Academy of Science 332, p 137-144 [15] Wood, Bernard A. Human Evolution: Early Radiations. 2002, John Wiley & Sons, Encyclopedia of Life Sciences, www.els.ne [16] Jobling, Mark A; Hurles, Matthew E; Tyler-Smith, Chris. Human Evolutionary Genetics: Origins, Peoples & Disease. 2004, Garland Publishing, New York, NY, p 237 [17] Suwa, Gen; Kono, Reiko T; Katoh, Shigehiro; Asfaw, Berhane; Beyene, Yonas. A New Species of Great Ape from the Late Miocene Epoch in Ethiopia. 2007, Nature 448, p 921-924 [18] Brown, P; Sutikna, T; Morwood, M J; Soejono, R P; Jatmiko; Saptomo, E W; Due, R A. A New Small-Bodied Hominin from the Late Pleistocene of Flores, Indonesia, 2004, Nature 431, p 1055 [19] Morwood, M J; Soejono, R P; Roberts, R G; Sutikna, T; Turney, C S M; Westaway, K E; Rink, W J; Zhao, J- x; van den Bergh, G D; Due, R A; Hobbs, D R; Moore, M W; Bird, M I; Fifield, L K. Archaeology and Age of a New Hominin from Flores in Eastern Indonesia. 2004, Nature 431, p 1087-1091 [20] Tocheri, M W; Orr, C M; Larson, S G; Sutikna, T; Jatmiko; Saptomo, E W; Due, R A; Djubiantono, T; Morwood, M J; Jungers, W L. The Primitive Wrist of Homo Floresiensis and Its Implications for Hominin Evolution. 2007, Science 317, p 1743-1745 [21] Gordon, A D; Nevell, L; Wood, Bernard. The Homo Floresiensis Cranium (LB1): Size, Scaling, and Early Homo Affinities. 2008, PNAS 105(12), p 4650-4655 [22] Haines, Tim; Chambers, Paul. The Complete Guide to Prehistoric Life. 2006, Firefly Books, Buffalo, NY, p 206 [23] Wood, Bernard A. ibid.
|
|
||||||||||
![]() |
|
||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
|
THIS SECTION: |
|||||||||||
|
INTELLIGENT ALIENS EVOLVED BEFORE US AND MANIPULATE THE SPECIES OF EARTH |
|||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||