|
|
|
||||||||||
|
Genesis 1 is Part of the Priestly Document There is a broad consensus among scholars
that the creation story in Genesis 1 is part of the Priestly text, the last and least trustworthy of the four sources of the Pentateuch. Therefore, the credibility of Genesis 1, and
indeed its very place in the Bible, is tied to the credibility of the Priestly
text. Their fate is bound together. If one is rejected, the other must also be
rejected. Every wound inflicted upon the
Priestly text is a wound inflicted upon Genesis 1, and every wound inflicted upon
Genesis 1 is a wound inflicted upon creationism and its mutant clone
"Intelligent Design." We may
assert this because Genesis 1 is part of the Priestly text. The scholars testify to this as follows
(emphasis added): Hyers – "If the seven day account was written in the context of the dark period
of the exile following the Babylonian conquest of Jerusalem and the deportation
of the Jews to Babylonia, as most
scholars concur, any points of correspondence with Babylonian cosmology
take on additional meaning and power… the construction of the text as we have
it strongly suggests that it is from priestly hands of the exilic period (500's BC).
It is therefore referred to as the Priestly account, reflecting a
priestly style and content."[1] Wellhausen – "The Bible begins with the account of the Priestly Code of the creation
of the world."[2] Campbell and O’Brien – "It is thought that
P (P is short for Priestly text) was composed around the time of Israel’s
exile: either in the years immediately
before, when the exile was threateningly immanent; in the time of the exile
itself; or shortly after the end of the exile… in this creation account, P presents a stately and ordered view of
creation…"[3] Friedman – "The famous opening of P’s story in the first chapter of
the Bible is: 'In the beginning of God’s creating the heavens and the earth,
the earth was unformed and void…'"[4] Smith – "A Priestly
text, Genesis 1 shows a modification of old mythic material known from
Israel and the rest of the ancient Near East. This creation story combines two different
visions of the cosmos: the first and
older view where the cosmos is the stage where divine wills engage in conflict;
and the second and largely priestly notion that the cosmos is a holy place
analogous to a sanctuary."[5] Return to this section's landing page: Genesis 1 is a forgery. The creationist
narrative in Genesis 1 is contradicted by many ancient Christian texts. Instead of an Almighty Creator God, ancient
Christian texts espouse that the
universe was born from blind arrogance and stupidity. The angels
caused evolution to occur from species to species. There
are many gods, (or aliens?), and the
Christian God is just one among them.
Satan the Devil writes scripture, and thus the Bible was
polluted with Genesis 1. Archaeology
and modern scholarship demonstrate that Genesis is indeed corrupted. Cavemen
walk with Adam and Eve. Esoteric
prophecies reveal the coming of Christ, and also reveal the
dark forces that govern the cosmos. Such
are the ancient Christian writings. Science vindicates the
truth of these ideas. Evolution
often happens too fast for Darwin’s theory.
Gaps in the fossil record indicate that some kind of unnatural force acts
together with natural selection. Astrobiology
reveals that intelligent life probably evolved long before us. The fossil record reveals strange clues that aliens
abducted species and transported them across oceans, and that DNA
from diverse lineages was combined to spawn hybrid species. Evidently, aliens influence evolution, and
they are the gods of the world’s religions.
This is not fiction. All these facts are thoroughly documented in the links above.
[1] Hyers, Conrad. The Meaning of Creation: Genesis and Modern Science. 1984, John Knox Press, Atlanta, GA, p 51 [2] Wellhausen, Julius. Translated by Sutherland, J Black; Menzies, Allan. Prolegomena to the History of Israel 8.1.1, Kessinger Publishing, p 204 [3] Campbell, Antony F; O’Brien, Mark A. Sources of the Pentateuch: Texts, Introductions, Annotations. 1993, Fortress Press, Minneapolis, MN, p 22 [4] Friedman, Richard Elliott. Who Wrote the Bible? 1997, HarperCollins Publishers, San Francisco, CA, p 167 [5] Smith, Mark S. The Origins of Biblical Monotheism: Israel's Polytheistic Background and the Ugaritic Texts. 2001, Oxford University Press, New York, NY, p 167-168 [6] Friedman, Richard Elliott. Who Wrote the Bible? 1997, HarperCollins Publishers, San Francisco, CA, p 210 |
|||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Ancient lore says the Jerusalem temple (above) was built with the help of demons. The Genesis Creation Story was written by heretic priests of that temple. |
|||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
|
THIS SECTION: |
|||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Ancient Christians believed that some parts of the Bible were written by God and other parts of the Bible were written by Satan the Devil. |
|||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Above: Marduk, the hero of Enuma Elish, the pagan myth from which Genesis 1 is derived. Below: Map of Israel and where different parts of the Bible came from. |
|||||||||||
![]() |
|||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||