Where Are the Gods?

      If the universe is filled with space alien gods, then where are they?  Why don't we see them on a regular basis?  Some might argue that we do see them in flying saucers and during abductions.  But if that is true, then why don't they reveal some of the mystery about themselves?  The answer probably resides in the fact that they don't want to reveal the mystery.  They have played God with us forever, and they would just as soon continue the game.  Why stop now?  Why not continue the mysteries of the paranormal?  Information is power, and so why should they give us power by yielding information about themselves?

 

Evolution Is Caused by Failures in Laboratory Security

      The history of evolution on earth may hold the answer for why the aliens are so secretive.  As demonstrated earlier, there have been inexplicable sudden appearances of diverse new body plans at certain periods of earth's history, and inexplicable movements of species across oceans.  But these events do not seem to have the markings of a well-designed plan that has been effected down through the ages.  Events like the Cambrian Explosion, the rapid evolution of snakes and birds, and the sudden appearance of seals and turtles – these rapid evolutionary events are spaced so haphazardly across such great stretches of time, that it is unlikely they are part a premeditated plan of extraterrestrial guidance across all time. 

      Thus, the bulk of alien involvement in earth's evolutionary history was not premeditated; rather, it was accidental, temporal, and non-directional.  It was not intelligent design; rather, it was intelligent interference. 

      A logical hypothesis, therefore, is that the aliens did not create or design new forms to put on earth.  Rather, they designed new forms for themselves, and occasionally they accidentally leaked DNA from their genetic engineering laboratories, which unintentionally came to earth. 

      From the aliens' perspective, why should they care about the course of evolution on earth?  Is there any profit in it for them?  If not, then why should they try to influence it?     If aliens have a stake in the genetic engineering of new forms, it would be in the genetic engineering of themselves, in order to improve themselves, or to diversify themselves in order to fulfill different tasks, or to create subordinate slave species to assist them.  They have no reason to cause genetic engineering on earth.  Hence, they don't intentionally do so.

      However, if some forms on earth occasionally produce a DNA sequence they find useful, they may abduct the individual who carries the DNA sequence, and copy that individual's DNA for usage in their own laboratories, for the improvement of their own species.  The aliens, in essence, create hybrid alien-earthling DNA.  Occasionally, every once in a long while, one of the hybrid DNA strings accidentally finds its way back into earth's general population, and breeds with other members of the original species, thus interjecting a new and nearly functional DNA sequence into the gene pool, which is adjusted by means of natural selection to produce a fully functional new form.  If several such events occur within a lineage in rapid succession, we have an explanation for the sudden appearance of new forms.  Thus, DNA leakage from the genetic engineering laboratories of aliens may very well be the reason for the abnormally sudden appearances of new forms that paleontologists regularly observe in the fossil record.  The rich biodiversity of earth, therefore, is made possible because we are the accidental DNA dumpster of space aliens.

 

Enochian Reprobates

      What causes such breaches of security in the alien laboratories?  How is it that individuals carrying hybrid DNA are allowed to roam free procreating in the general population?  If the book of Enoch and other ancient texts are to be believed, these breaches are the result of bestial perversion and lust, which drives "angels," that is aliens and hybrids, to engage in acts of intercourse with the species of earth.  This may explain why the angels who had sex with human women were thrown into the dungeons of hell, according to the ancient texts, because the government of the aliens considers it a crime to compromise the security of the genetic engineering laboratories, and so they lock them in some kind of prison, which they have revealed to us as "hell." 

      This also explains why sudden changes in body plan occur only sporadically in the fossil record, not all the time, because the security of the laboratories is tight enough, and the penalties deterrent enough, that breaches in security don't happen every day, but only happen once in a great while.  Therefore massive leaps in evolutionary diversity only happen once in a great while. 

      There is also the possibility that the more embarrassing mutants are absconded with, and thus never fossilized and found.  For example, although Bigfoot sightings and footprints are very common, the bones of Bigfoot have never been found.  Perhaps the UFO occupants who are responsible for the recent evolution of Bigfoot take precautions to hide the bones of such transitory species.  Also, the aliens may quickly annihilate the children of their comrades' indiscretions, as was the case in Noah's Flood, whereby the alien authorities destroyed the half-breed nephilim giants.  Because such monsters were short-lived, the opportunity for fossilization was greatly abbreviated, and this may explain why frankenstein monsters in the fossil record are the exception rather than the rule.  We may never know the true measure of how many monsters have come and gone on this planet, because the alien governments have destroyed them before they become common enough to be seen in the fossil record.

      Now that we have become an intelligent species, it has become even more necessary for the space alien gods to tighten security and conceal their activities, in order to continue their genetic engineering projects without arousing the suspicion of humans.  Consequently, we just don't see them very often, and when we do, they are secretive, illusive, and they promulgate disinformation campaigns to confuse us.

Another factor may be the periodic absence of alien intelligence from our solar system due to interstellar star wars between alien societies, which force aliens to leave the solar system.  Alien absence may explain why certain long periods of time passed with no lineages undergoing radical changes. 

Hence, macro-mutations caused by aliens are infrequent and sporadic, because there were long periods of time during which the extraterrestrial presence was non-existent or self-restrained. 

 

Not Enough Aliens?

      Space aliens may have expanded the genetic wealth of our planet by means of casual sexual encounters with the life of earth, but the accumulated evolutionary change has not happened overnight.  Their slow progress may be due to the limited numbers of such perverts.  The book of Enoch claims that there were 200 "angels" which came down from heaven and procreated with the daughters of men.[1] 

      With such a small population of perverts, the space aliens do not have the capability to effect large amounts of evolutionary change across all life forms at all times.  Instead, they must focus on a few species or genera at a time, and procreate with them for several dozens of generations, in order to effect a rapid evolutionary event.  The degree to which they can exert internal social control among themselves for the purpose of perpetrating such an event might be inadequate for continuous achievement of such endeavors.  Without the social discipline and cohesion necessary to accomplish a mutual goal of developing a certain species, each alien goes their own way, procreating with whatever species suits their fancy, the results of which are minimal because their single contributions to the gene pools of various species are watered down and lost in the greater population.  Hence, rapid evolution is infrequent because the group of space aliens effecting evolutionary change is too small and too disorganized to consistently accomplish premeditated speciation events.

 

Aliens Working Against Each Other

      There is even some evidence from scripture that competing groups of aliens have thwarted each others attempts to effect evolutionary change.  Specifically, Satan's angels had sex with humans and procreated with them hoping that when Jesus Christ was born, he would ironically be the great-great-great-grandson of a Satanic angel.  In the Bible, God says to Satan the Devil, "I will put enmity between your offspring and the woman's offspring,"[2] which can mean that Satan has children, and that he was trying to destroy the human race and pollute its Messianic bloodline by injecting Satanic DNA into the human gene pool. 

      Under these circumstances, it would be very difficult for any faction of space aliens to achieve meaningful evolutionary progress, because they have to contend with rival factions of aliens, who are continuously polluting the gene pools of the species they are trying to enhance.  This may be responsible for the slow progress of evolution.

 

Chimps and Gorillas

      A lot of people say we evolved from chimpanzees and gorillas.  I beg to differ!  The chimps and gorillas evolved from us!  We are the more primitive species!  Perhaps we evolved from some cousin of the orangutans, but we did not come from chimps or gorillas. 

      This argument comes from the fossil record.  There are no gorillas or chimpanzees in the fossil record prior to comparatively recent times.[3]  Although hominid fossils are common, there has been only one find of chimpanzee fossils, dating to between 284,000 and 545,000 years ago.[4] As Harrison said,

 

The evolutionary history of extant humanoids (i.e. – gorillas, chimps, and humans) is poorly known, with the notable exception of humans, which have a relatively complete fossil record extending back more than 4 million years… the fossil record for African apes is entirely unknown.  The evolution of the orangutan is, by comparison, much better documented.[5]

 

Just going from what the fossils say, the chimps and the gorillas have not been on this planet nearly as long as we have.  Some say that we can't find more fossils of chimps and gorillas because they live in the jungle, and fossils don't preserve well in the jungle.  But does this make sense?  How is it that Pleistocene Orangutan fossils are scattered all across southeast Asia?[6]  Is that not jungle too?  In the Miocene, Europe was covered in tropical forests.  Ape fossils have been recovered from hundreds of locations all across European strata of that time.  In fact, when the European jungles retreated in the late Miocene, so did the apes, for they cannot be found in great numbers in Europe except for where there was jungle.[7]  From the early Eocene to the early Oligocene, 196 fossil primate species are known, and from the late Oligocene to the late Pleistocene, 167 fossil primate species are known.  Fossil primates have been found on every continent except Australia and Antarctica.[8]  Thus, the primate fossil record is comparatively well-known, both in numbers and across time frames.  If chimps and gorillas were in Africa for the past 6 or 7 million years, since the time they allegedly diverged from us, then we should see more evidence for it. 

      Despite the fossil gap, the chimps and gorillas are very much related to us.  The chimps share 98.6% of our DNA, or 95.2% if deletions are added to substitutions.[9]  They look like us, they have DNA like us, and they even act like us.  But they are not found in the fossil record before us.  So we did not evolve from them.  If anything, they evolved from us!

      If you took a chimpanzee, and put both a human and a gorilla right in front of his nose, and then asked him "Who's your daddy," the chimp would point at the human, not the gorilla.  Likewise, a gorilla would also point to the human, not the chimp.  A test using the agent antiserum against albumin revealed that both chimps and gorillas are more related to us than to each other.[10]  Despite having much in common, such as hairy bodies, knuckle walking, and much smaller brain sizes than we do, they are more closely related to us than to each other.  A Jukes-Cantor measurement of the distance between genomes sheds some light on the subject.  When comparing the chimp genome to gorilla and human genomes, the chimp is in all tests more closely related to humans than to gorillas.  When comparing the gorilla genome to chimp and human genomes, the non-coding genes, autosomals, pseudogenes, and synonymous genes of the gorilla show a closer genetic relationship to humanity than to the chimp.  For non-synonymous genes, the gorilla shows just a hair more affinity toward the chimp – these being the genes under the pressures of natural selection.[11] 

      Here's why:  non-synonymous genes are subject to the pressures of natural selection, whereas synonymous genes are not.  Gorillas and chimps live in similar jungle environments, and this has caused them to acquire similar characteristics, but the synonymous genes reveal lineages by means of tracing DNA that has been left unaltered by selective pressures.  That's how we know chimps and gorillas are more closely related to us than to each other.  Natural selection has caused chimps and gorillas to look more similar to each other than to us.  However, when their genomes are analyzed, chimps and gorillas both turn out to be more closely related to us than to each other. 

 

The Evolution, Devolution, and Devilization of Humanity

      It appears that some aliens don't really want humans on this planet, so they have attempted to devolve us back into less intelligent animals.  To reverse human evolution, they have inserted ape-like DNA into our gene pool, thus causing gorillas and chimps and other small-brained hominids to evolve from us.

      The predictions of the so-called "molecular clock" tell us that humans and chimps diverged from each other 6 million years ago, and that humans and gorillas diverged 7 million years ago.[12]  Some give it a wider range, from 5 to 8 million years ago.[13]  This information is in tension with the fossil record, which does not show chimp or gorilla fossils until much more recent times.  Be that as it may, let us suppose that the molecular clock is correct, and that the fossils just have not been found. 

      In this scenario, then, if we trace our ancestry back through the fossil record, we should expect to find our ancestors from 6 and 7 million years ago to look like primitive chimps and gorillas.  Yet the fossils of this age that are potentially ancestral to humans reflect more similarity to humanity than to chimps or gorillas.  Sahelanthropus was an ape-like human in precisely this time frame of 6 to 7 million years ago.  It had human characteristics such as a flatter face, smaller canines, and thicker tooth enamel than in other apes, and a human-like attachment of the spinal chord to the brain, which indicates that Sahelanthropus probably walked on two feet, instead of on his knuckles.[14]  As Jobling et al say, "these findings can barely be reconciled with a chimp-human split of 5-7 million years ago."[15]  About this same time there appears Orrorin,[16] walking on two feet, and with thick enamel on its teeth – two distinctly human characteristics not shared by chimps or gorillas.  There is also Ardipithecus, which has chimp-like characters (thin enamel to name one); yet it could stand on two feet more efficiently than a chimp.[17]  From this, we might conclude that humans are devolving into apes, as Jobling et al said,

 

All these early hominid fossils appear to represent chimpanzee-sized, upright-walking species… The most radical possibility is that bipedalism is the primitive trait and knuckle-walking in chimpanzees is derived…[18]

 

One possible explanation is that the molecular evidence is just wrong, and that chimps and gorillas diverged much earlier.  Suwa et al propose this, based on some 10 million year-old gorilla-like teeth, yet unlike modern gorilla teeth, these have thick enamel and other differences.[19] 

 

Our Unfortunate Relatives

      The fossil remains of the hominid Homo floresiensis are only 38,000 to 18,000 years old, yet the forehead is receding, and the brain size is smaller than that of the ape-man Australopithecus – only 380 cubic centimeters, which is surprisingly tiny even for its relative body size.  Australopithecus and Paranthropus had gone extinct 2 million years previously, and even they had larger brains for their body size!  H. floresiensis is in most other respects human, including its teeth, basic skull shape, and ability to walk upright on two feet.[20]  Despite its small brain, it appears to have used tools and lit fires.  For some, its technological achievements indicate it must have been derived from more advanced hominids such as possibly Homo erectus.  Yet H. erectus had a brain more than twice the size and was already extinct by then.  Multiple specimens have been found, which means we are not dealing with a dwarf or abnormal mutant, but rather with a regular population.[21]  Humans just like us were contemporary with H. floresiensis.  Even the Neanderthals were almost extinct.  We might say we are their nearest relative, if it weren't for the fact that the wrist of H. floresiensis is apparently more primitive than both human and Neanderthal wrists.[22]  Some even argue that the root of its divergence from the human line is quite ancient – going back to Homo habilis.[23]  The problem is, H. habilis died out nearly 2 million years ago.  Where are its fossils for the past 2 million years? 

      Could this strange creature be the product of malicious space aliens, who were attempting to thwart human evolution by devolving us into lower apes?  The natives of Indonesia claim that a small hairy clan of people who spoke a different language was still present some 300 years ago.[24]  H. floresiensis was found in Indonesia.  Apparently, the ape-men are coming back. 

      There is also the ape-man Paranthropus, which, although it is not necessarily a step down in terms of brain size, certainly was not a step up either.  It's non-technological, apparently root-digging lifestyle, was an evolutionary dead end.  Wood called it a "bushpig."[25]

      Similar types of alien devolution and corruption of the human genome is attested for in the ancient legends of the Germanic peoples, who recorded the existence of hobbits, dwarfs, elves, and trolls as sub-human hominids.  The Germanic legends even preserve the word nephilim from Genesis 6 as niflheim. 

 

Bigfoot

      Then there is Bigfoot, which is sometimes seen in connection with UFOs.  Bigfoot DNA was attained when one of them accidently stepped on some screws and bloodied his foot.  This incident occurred at Snow Grove Lake in the Canadian wilderness.  The DNA sequence revealed that Bigfoot's genome is actually closer to humans than to our closest relative – chimpanzees.[26]  Perhaps Bigfoot is the aliens' most recent attempt to devolve our species with apelike DNA. 

      Bigfoot has no fossil record, which causes many skeptics to doubt its existence.  But no fossil record could also mean that its origins are very recent, which is consistent with the hypothesis that aliens devolved it from us in the not-to-distant past.

      Some skeptics believe Bigfoot sightings are just misidentified bears.  However, that theory cannot hold water in light of bear population data.  There have been 419 Bigfoot sightings in the state of Washington, but only 13 in the state of Maine.[27]  Yet, the bear populations of the two states are comparable.  Washington has a bear population of about 30,000, and Maine has a bear population of just over 20,000.[28]  Washington has over 30 times as many Bigfoot sightings as Maine, despite having a comparatively similar bear population.  The same story is evident from other states.  Montana and Idaho are home to over 40,000 bears, which is more than Washington contains, but Montana and Idaho together have recorded only 77 Bigfoot sightings, which is far fewer than Washington's 419.  Minnesota has about 20,000 bears, but only 35 Bigfoot sightings.  Wisconsin has 14,000 bears, but only 42 Bigfoot sightings.  If Bigfoot sightings are just misidentified bears, then why don't we see more Bigfoot sightings in these bear infested states?  In response, a skeptic might say that the frequency of Bigfoot sightings in the Pacific Northwest is a function of the disproportionate rate of marijuana consumption in that region of the country.  However, there are some states with comparatively little marijuana usage, and with virtually no bears, yet they have a lot of Bigfoot sightings.   Florida has a meager 1,000-1,500 bears, and old folks categorically don't smoke pot, yet Florida has 129 recorded Bigfoot sightings.  Texas and Ohio have virtually no bears, yet Texas has 160 Bigfoot sightings and Ohio has 191.  Clearly, Bigfoot sightings should not be ascribed to misidentified bears. 

      Below is a chart showing a hypothetical phylogeny of humans and the species that aliens have devolved from us.

Government Cover Up?

      The idea that aliens work closely with the US Air Force is nothing new.  In 1983, a document was revealed from the Kirtland Air Force Base in New Mexico which said,

 

All questions and mysteries about the evolution of homo-sapiens have been answered and this project is closed.[29]

 

Also, a man named Bob Lazar who claims to have worked at the famous top-secret base at Area 51, where UFO’s have allegedly been spotted, claims that aliens have been visiting for thousands of years, and they have made a total of 65 genetic corrections to our species.[30]

 

A Laughingstock

      One of the principle faculties by which aliens relate to humans is in the capacity of story teller.  Aliens love telling humans tall-tales in order to test our credulity and thereby gain an opportunity to laugh at us when we believe their outrageous stories. 

      According to some, a group of hostile aliens from the constellation of Orion is on its way to attack us.  This is entirely preposterous, and an outrageous lie, because the stars in the constellation of Orion are massive blue stars.  Not only do they emit too much heat for any life to exist, but also their output is highly ultraviolet, which means they would zap any living creature with enough radiation to fry it from the outside in.  Life is not possible under such conditions. 

      To some parents, the aliens reveal that their children are more highly evolved than other children.  Many who have passed this information along to their kids observe that their children develop feelings of superiority and become sociopathic, which they take as verification of the child's special gifts.  These they style "indigo children."

      In another example, it was allegedly revealed to the self-identified alien contactee and "prophet" Billy Meier that there exists a very attractive female space alien named Semjase who is temporarily mentally handicapped.  She is extremely gorgeous, even though she is 344 years old.  She has big earlobes and a pretty face, but the best part about her is that she is available.  Her former husband crashed into a star while going light speed.

      It is also circulated that the little gray aliens called Zeta Reticula have no mouth and no rectum.  Instead of normal bodily functions, they must periodically swim around in a purple stew of dead body parts, into which they excrete all wastes and absorb food through the skin.

      Then there is the case of the extraterrestrial sodomizers.  According to one abduction report, a man was rectum-raped by a space alien, but the alien withdrew when the man called on the name of Jesus.[31]  In ancient times, King Solomon also met up with a certain butt-loving paranormal entity who bluntly stated, "I don't have sex with a lot of women – only the pretty ones… I ejaculate into their butt."[32]  It is precisely this kind of mentality that has driven space aliens to insert their DNA into our gene pool.  It is also known that a certain group of early Christians believed that Adam and Eve took turns being the girl with a bisexual snake in the Garden of Eden.[33] 

      One must wonder about the purpose of such revelations.  Perhaps human credulity is being broadcasted on alien sitcoms for the entertainment of couch potato space monsters who sit around laughing at us all day.  Can we blame them?  In a world with no God, no love, no justice, and no promise of heaven, where the best you can hope for is killing others before they kill you, what better way to pass the time than making dirty jokes?  Sex and violence is entertaining because it fulfills instinctual cravings that have been molded by evolution.  The whole process of evolution depends on sex to make new life and violence to destroy incompetent life.  Therefore, we are biologically hard-wired to be entertained by sex and violence.   

 

The Fear of an Apocalypse

      As I write this, global financial markets are facing the worst meltdown ever, caused by corruption and reckless hedonism within the United States of Disneyland.  It would be easy for me to say the beginning of the days of wrath is upon us, and that the Second Coming is right around the corner.  But this would be a foolish prediction. 

      Numerous dictators have proven that fear is the best way to control the masses.  What better way for aliens to control us than with fear?  And what is more fearful than the end of the world?  In recent years, the list of pop-culture apocalyptic predictions has grown quite long – Nostradamus, the end of the Mayan Calendar, the prophecies of the Bible Code, certain apocalyptic oracles of the Virgin Mary, the Hale-Bopp suicide, New Age mediums and prophets, the arrival of the indigo children, meteor strikes, worst-case global warming scenarios, Islamic and Jewish messianic movements – these only worsen the never-ending cacophony of various dispensationalist Christian eschatologies that have grown increasingly louder since they first started making false predictions in 1844. 

      Who or what is behind this apocalyptic frenzy?  And why do the predictions keep pouring in despite so many false alarms?

      The constant fear of the end of the world is by no means a product of our imagination, nor is it a feature of normal human psychology.  To the contrary, for the vast majority of the time our species has existed, we have barely even considered the concept of an apocalypse.  What stone-age cave painting envisions an apocalypse?  For nearly 2,000 years, the Christian churches de-emphasized the apocalyptic predictions of Jesus Christ, preferring allegorical and amillennarian interpretations instead.  Islam saw the end of the world as a resurrection, not a calamity.  Hinduism saw time as a wheel without end.  Buddhism barely considered the issue at all.  Such was the status of most world religions for the great majority of the Common Era.  Even before then, the legends of the ancient Babylonians, Egyptians, and Hebrews were more concerned with origins and temporary political situations than with the end of the world.  The Greek and Germanic myths were no more governed by apocalyptic thinking than with sobriety and decency.  Apocalyptic thinking is by no means a normal human thought pattern.  Religion across the globe was decidedly non-apocalyptic for millennia. 

      Then, something changed.  In recent decades, there has been a dramatic increase in the popularity of religions that feature the apocalypse as a doctrine of primary importance.  Wholly apocalyptic religions such as the New Age and dispensationalist Christianity did not even exist until very recently.  Yet they have quickly spread to permeate the consciousness of our entire society. 

      Therefore, it is reasonable to conclude that the constant fear of the apocalypse which grips us today is a phenomenon unique unto our own time.  This fact is evidence that apocalyptic thinking comes from a source other than from our own human psyche.  It comes from subversive influences outside the human mind.  These influences are attempting to control us by making us fear an apocalypse. 

      As scientific knowledge has freed us from the shackles of ignorance, we humans have come to understand our world much better.  We now know that lightning is not a projectile thrown by an angry god.  We now know that the sun is not a god who is driven across the sky in a chariot.  And, although some environmentalists may differ, we have yet to discover the bottomless pit of hell lurking around our deep sea oil drilling facilities.  Consequently, we have lost our fear of the supernatural.  This causes apprehension among the space aliens, for they cannot control the human mind except by fear.  To replace the discarded superstitions of the past, they have invented a new superstition.  The fear of the apocalypse is this new superstition.  It is the solution to their problem, for it is a means by which to reestablish their control over the human mind. 

      The aliens will continue this fear-mongering apocalyptic strategy for as long as people believe it.  When their warnings are no longer credible, then they will create real apocalyptic events.